Loading BuildHop
Loading BuildHop
Founder Feed
Self-promotion welcome. Share your product, post updates, and connect with other founders.
Jude has responded to some feedback for Yapplicator
Claude slop website with zero proof this does anything outside of forms I can find on my own.
YapplicatorThis is a lazy criticism, not constructive product feedback. Calling something “Claude slop” does not identify a single technical flaw, and claiming the product does nothing beyond forms is an assertion without supporting evidence. If you believe the product adds no value, identify the specific features that fail, demonstrate where the experience breaks down, and explain what functionality is missing. We can work with concrete issues and measurable shortcomings.
Kamba has responded to some feedback for Mnemara
too many words in hero explains little performance issues with animations store- recal - replay not readable clearly add copy function on commands get rid of at least 50% of your copy and good luck
MnemaraThank you for your feedback, appreciate it. I'll see what I can do to improve it.
Kamba has responded to some feedback for PortForge
nice tool, the text on the hero section takes way too much space tho, it could be better with smaller font
PortForgeThanks for your feedback, appreciate it. I'll take a look and see how I can improve it!
Capy has responded to some feedback for CapyToolkit
I think this tool is broken, all I see is a broken HTML, hope you fix it soon so we can evaluate it
CapyToolkitHello, It would be great if you provide more details e.g. which tool shows broken HTML. Until then, I can't agree with your feedback since the app builds without any errors, PostHog shows exactly 0 errors / warnings, and your visit was less than 15 seconds without navigating outside the homepage. The only thing that comes to my mind is the issue with your connection to Cloudflare CDN. Best!
I’m seeing it as well, looks like your CSS isn’t loading. I just DM’d you a photo on X.
Anonymous
thanks for putting extra mile to check. I had a chance to review your product now that it loads - cool side project with free watermelon option, so changing my down-vote to up-vote!
Thank you for checking it again and nice feedback. It looks like an issue was in my custom Cloudflare rules, which affected Safari users. Hopefully. I managed to fix it for good.
Luke has responded to some feedback for Unaccountable
very strong hero and value prop - but it needs more visuals and less copy
Yes 100%. Completely agree. I've been meaning to do this for a while, but other projects have gotten in the way :D Thank you!
Utku has responded to some feedback for Psst – Tap a Friend
Cool concept, reminds me of when Facebook pushed the Poke feature. lol.
thank you, feel free to download the app and use it - I'd be super happy to receive more feedback!
thank you, feel free to download the app and use it - I'd be super happy to receive more feedback!
Great job bringing something back from the past. I just did that also with a site that recreates the fun of screaming "Wazzzup!" with the tongue wag.
Replying is worth 50 points · 100 with Spotlight
Hop Product
@screeendev has responded to some feedback for Relay
The TBD pricing I do get and understand, but I would just remove it and go with FREE for now. Get your data back and set the prices. TBD seems to be vague or like you are unsure still. Better to set a high price by whatever AI calls you are making and the cost to make a decent margin.
RelayYeah, just finished the work on it & it should be live anytime soon, Thanks for the feedback
Cristian Barin has responded to some feedback for SADFinder
make header transparent and redesign the hero section clean .
SADFinderThanks, I already did a redesign for the hero area and it's now in A/B testing
This person was honest, and that's fine. But it is a problem and we all know it. Facebook/Meta has taken all the fun out of social sites. People all just hang their heads and say "Facebook sucks, but I'm going to log in because I use messenger" ie.. they give up and don't try to fix the problem of the major overreach. At least I'm trying to address the PROBLEM with my SOLUTION. Sure it sucks rn. It's day #2 and version 0.0001.
I honestly don't want to be rude, but the idea sucks, the execution sucks, the field u r entering is extremely hard, in fact one of the hardest to crack since u need huge adoption, and with all social media around rn u ask ppl to join a new one? i'm sorry but this is just bad in every way
Replying is worth 50 points · 100 with Spotlight
Hop ProductI think you’re focusing too much on why YOU wanted to build this and not enough on the feedback around execution, which is valid, you even admit your agent built this in a matter of hours right? I’ll also say that a social network takes MASSIVE distribution or a massive marketing budget. I’d say focus less on the why and heavily consider the repeated feedback around execution.
Mark Z has responded to some feedback for WhereTheyAsk: Social sites used to be fun. Now you get banned for speaking your
I honestly don't want to be rude, but the idea sucks, the execution sucks, the field u r entering is extremely hard, in fact one of the hardest to crack since u need huge adoption, and with all social media around rn u ask ppl to join a new one? i'm sorry but this is just bad in every way
WhereTheyAsk: Social sites used to be fun. Now you get banned for speaking yourrepliedAppreciate you telling me how much my idea sucks, but at least I'm trying to build something that will eliminate the overreach of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, etc... or whoever the f'k Zu'ck decides to buy next. They have 22 years of dominance, and if Trump or his team would have said "We can't compete" that is all we'd have right now. They said "Screw that we'll build Truth Social" Problem found, and I'm trying to solve it. How about you, care to share your build?
Mark Z has responded to some feedback for WhereTheyAsk: Social sites used to be fun. Now you get banned for speaking your
I like the idea of a site trying to bring back facebook and myspace vibes, but i fear its going to attract the wrong visitors? also seems a bit too political for my liking, "your thoughts on the first amendment" and "what is your favourite gun you own" in group posts? and the site footer about first amendment. Not to mention sign in with google only to use the site.
WhereTheyAsk: Social sites used to be fun. Now you get banned for speaking yourrepliedThe idea of the Google sign in is that pretty much most people have a gmail, and if you don't - there is no way I'm letting you on the platform. We need to verify two things 1. You are the real person that owns this account and not a bot, 2. You can actually click the tokenized link in the first email. Plus if we need to email you site updates, etc... we have a real email you can check. Yes, it seems like we bowed to the powers of Google, but it's there to protect all users. Real people.
Mark Z has responded to some feedback for WhereTheyAsk: Social sites used to be fun. Now you get banned for speaking your
gives me vibes on myspace - but needs more visuals here. free speech is a strong claim , I appreciate you are working on free speech but we would like to see you displaying how you are gonna do the moderation
WhereTheyAsk: Social sites used to be fun. Now you get banned for speaking yourrepliedThe only things I am not allowing free speech on is "Terroism" "Self Harm" and maybe outright pr0n. I will think about it, as I want people to post stuff obviously and use the site more freely than Facebooklies and Redditban - but at the same time, people should need to view stuff like that - so I might work that into the code to hide it or blur it with the clearly marked issue with the post.
klein_more88816 has responded to some feedback for shotstudio
seems like an interesting project, i'd love if i can scroll in the real exports section when there are more entries. pricing seems nice, I like it
shotstudioThanks 😊,Clicking an example opens a large preview. The examples scroll smoothly now.
Anonymous
oh I meant to have the ability to manually scroll horizontally in the real exports section, but part of it becuz i want to quickly see everything not have automatically move from one to the other
ansheng hu has responded to some feedback for AI Hairstyle Fit
nice idea, i like the preview and think you should lower the text that comes afterwards a bit, and it should prove even further visually about facial structure not changing and whatnot. for FAQ u might wanna rephrase the when is my photo uploaded to something more clear about privacy tho the answer to the question is full, just the question that might need some rephrasing
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll take it on board and make things better. aihairstylefit is all about giving users a better experience.
@sflorimm has responded to some feedback for Danteshot.com
The scroll feels really laggy for me. I'm also not sure you could get the pricing link any smaller than you have? Perhaps worth mentioning your pricing or giving easier access to it for agentic purposes at least.
Thanks for pointing this out! The scroll lag is definitely something worth looking into, and I agree that pricing should be much easier to find. We’ll take another look at the landing page and make sure it’s easier for people (and AI agents) to find the information they need. Appreciate the feedback!
@sflorimm has responded to some feedback for Danteshot.com
kinda hidden pricing, I don't see FAQ or privacy on the landing page and everything is only accessible from the footer. Also I see a lot of the same in this domain, u have to give a unique value
Thanks for the honest feedback! I agree that pricing and important info like the FAQ and privacy policy should be easier to find. And yeah, the AI photo space is getting pretty crowded, so standing out is something we’re actively working on. Appreciate you taking the time to check it out!
@sflorimm has responded to some feedback for Danteshot.com
Your site speaks to everyone. who is this service for specifically? adding more proof would help building trust. Comparing yourself to competitors would help people understand how you are different / better
Thanks for the honest feedback! That makes sense. We’re still refining how we communicate who Danteshot is best for and what makes it different from other AI photo tools. Adding more examples and social proof is definitely something we can improve. Appreciate the suggestions!
@sflorimm has responded to some feedback for Danteshot.com
Looks clean, nice work. About the credit packs - might be nice to know upfront how many credits on average a single image consumes. Would help people make the best decision for their needs.
Thanks! That’s actually a really good point. We’ll look into making it clearer how many credits an image typically uses so people can get a better idea of what they’re getting with each pack. Appreciate the feedback!
12 Axes Test has responded to some feedback for 12 Axes Test
Well this has me totally confused now. I thought it was a quiz to test how you politically align and the next thing is talking about passports. Fix the flow or something
12 Axes TestThanks, that is fair feedback. The 12 Axes Test is a political alignment quiz: 36, 60 or 288 statements, scored on twelve scales. The passport is only how the result is shown: your closest ideology, country and historical figure on one page you can share. We clearly introduce that too late, so people hit the passport before they know why. We will look at how the quiz hands off to the result so that is clearer. If you want the quick route, the 36-statement version takes about three minutes.
Anonymous
Thanks for clearing up the Passport issue. Now here is another wrench to give you to work on. What about the people (USA) that only have a "Real ID" but no passport?
Brain Liu has responded to some feedback for BrowseSprint
I mean I'm trying to be fair to judge it but - there's no product, it's just waitlist fair, you are trying to see if there's any demand But there's no clear reason why your solution might work or actually works as you mentioned you can not make promise on speed So ok, no products available no promises, let's see try to judge if you are explaining how you are gonna achieve that? It does not exist either. I feel like you are very early on this idea, keep building, good luck
BrowseSprintThanks for the detailed critique. I've added a usable CSV checker without signup and a concrete extension roadmap covering the local MCP bridge, grouped reads, page-state invalidation, outcome checks and paired task benchmarks. The extension is still a design; the linked executed examples do not establish a speedup. Could you review https://codexbrowse.site/technical-roadmap and tell me whether the build path and test criteria now address your concern?
Brain Liu has responded to some feedback for BrowseSprint
what are you providing to the users? also the title text is quite massive, I don't think its benefiting the page being that large
BrowseSprintThanks for the specific feedback. I've reduced the headline size, replaced the lime-green palette, and made the current offering explicit: a free local CSV checker, a Codex troubleshooting guide and inspectable code examples. Email signup is optional for research updates, and the proposed extension has its own technical roadmap. Could you revisit https://codexbrowse.site/ and let me know whether the value is clearer now?
Brain Liu has responded to some feedback for BrowseSprint
I like the idea but the website feels off, there is no proof and there is no convincing feels like an empty promise
BrowseSprintThanks for asking for evidence. The updated site has a working, no-email CSV checker and links to code plus actual AutoGen/Crawlee outputs, with explicit limits on what they prove. I've also added an implementation roadmap and test gates; the extension isn't released and no speedup has been measured. Could you take another look at https://codexbrowse.site/ and tell me whether the evidence and current status are clearer?
Brain Liu has responded to some feedback for BrowseSprint
I mean I want it but I'm confused how does this take shape and how it works.
BrowseSprintThanks for pointing out the missing explanation. I've published a concrete technical roadmap: a Chrome extension plus a local Codex MCP companion, grouped page reads, valid page-state reuse, outcome checks and release gates. The extension isn't released yet. The free CSV checker is usable now without signup. Could you review https://codexbrowse.site/technical-roadmap and let me know whether the proposed workflow makes sense?
Brain Liu has responded to some feedback for BrowseSprint
This is a site collecting emails for future invites I am guessing. But for people only using Codex? Site is confusing and last month's AI Lime Green is not feeling very good this month.
BrowseSprintThanks for the feedback. I've updated the site with a smaller headline, a calmer blue/neutral palette, and a clearer explanation of who it's for. The guide and new CSV checker work without an email; Codex is the starting point for the proposed extension, while the manual checker can be used with other tools. Could you take another look at https://codexbrowse.site/ and tell me whether that distinction is clearer?
